Joe Rogan, Ivermectin and the ‘Politicization of Information’
Russell Brand slammed the mainstream media in a new video for having “very little objectivity,” and using everything as an “opportunity to score points for the ‘left’ and ‘right.’”
Brand said he has no opinion on how COVID should be treated and isn’t qualified to offer advice — but he does have an opinion on how the media reports on certain issues and what biases are at play.
Brand questioned why information on ivermectin, an antiparasitic drug given to 4 billion people worldwide, is so politicized. He highlighted a clip from “The Joe Rogan Podcast” where Rogan addresses the media storm that ensued after he went public about using ivermectin.
In his podcast, Rogan said:
“They keep saying I took a horse dewormer. I literally got it from a doctor. It’s an American company. They won the Nobel Prize in 2015 for use in human beings, and CNN is saying I’m taking horse dewormer. They must know that’s a lie.”
Rogan said he’s considering suing CNN for accusing him of putting out misinformation about ivermectin.
Politicizing medical treatments
To unpack the mainstream media’s condemnation of Rogan’s decision to take ivermectin, Brand points to an article by Matt Taibbi — “Ivermectin: Can a Drug Be ‘Right-Wing’?”
The article notes the varying opinions on using ivermectin to treat COVID.
“As is noted in nearly every mainstream story about the subject, the WHO has advised against its use pending further study, there have been randomized studies showing it to be ineffective in speeding recovery, and the drug’s original manufacturer, Merck, has said there’s no ‘meaningful evidence’ of efficacy for COVID-19 patients.
“However, it’s also patently untrue, as is frequently asserted, that there’s no evidence that the drug might be effective.
“This past week, for instance, Oxford University announced it was launching a large-scale clinical trial. The study has already recruited more than 5,000 volunteers, and its announcement says what little is known to be true: that ‘small pilot studies show that early administration with ivermectin can reduce viral load and the duration of symptoms in some patients with mild COVID-19,’ that it’s ‘a well-known medicine with a good safety profile,’ and ‘because of the early promising results in some studies, it is already being widely used to treat COVID-19 in several countries.
“The Oxford text also says ‘there is little evidence from large-scale randomized controlled trials to demonstrate that it can speed up recovery from the illness or reduce hospital admission.’ But to a person who might have a family member suffering from the disease, just the information about ‘early promising results’ would probably be enough to inspire demands for a prescription, which might be the problem, of course. Unless someone was looking for that information, they likely wouldn’t find it, as mainstream news even of the Oxford study has been effectively limited to a pair of Bloomberg and Forbes stories.”
Brand said what he found interesting about the article is the discussion about the “politicization of information.”
Mainstream media has “very little objectivity,” Brand said, and uses everything as an “opportunity to score points for what’s regarded as the ‘left’ and ‘right.’”
Rolling Stone article demonizing ivermectin is debunked
On Sept. 5, Rolling Stone published a now-debunked report falsely claiming the use of ivermectin to treat COVID had emergency rooms in Oklahoma “so backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting” access to medical care.
Rolling Stone didn’t retract the piece, but instead issued a correction saying that a hospital denied Oklahoma doctor Jason McElyea’s claim that ivermectin overdoses were causing delays in treating gunshot victims.
The story also sparked controversy because of the image Rolling Stone used in the article, which, on social media, looked as if the people waiting in line were waiting for treatment at an emergency room in Oklahoma.
Holy shift even the photo was fake pic.twitter.com/dOJw9D08Tn
— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) September 5, 2021
Brand: ‘You should be entitled to make your own decision’ on vaccines
When it comes to COVID vaccines, Brand is a firm believer in personal choice.
“If you want to be vaccinated, you should become vaccinated if you’re comfortable with the information you’ve been given around that subject. If you’re a person who doesn’t want to be vaccinated, you should be entitled to make your decision.”
And when people say “not being vaccinated affects” others, Brand said that same attitude of considering how your personal actions affect others should be applied to a whole host of issues, including distribution of wealth, public speech and education.
“It’s interesting that that’s being applied strictly in one area of public and medical life and not others. If you don’t understand why people are cynical of pharmaceutical companies and the government, then you haven’t been paying attention for the last 20 years.”
Watch the video here:
The above article (Joe Rogan, Ivermectin and the ‘Politicization of Information’) was originally published on The Defender and is re-published here by ‘contribution’ with attribution to the author, Children’s Health Defense Team and The Defender.
Image Credit: Photos in Featured Image (top) are screen captures from the YouTube video.
Read more articles by: Children’s Health Defense Team
TLB Editors Note: TLB highly recommends you click on the image (the Defender) below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!!
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
Click on image below to visit site:
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.